Quote:
Originally Posted by Me
I thought the main reason was that they were more likely to be sexually abused if captured? :-\
|
its more likely for a man 2 be arse raped when captive than a woman to be raped as women being raped is more common than men so its more embarassing for a big army man 2 admit he was raped than a female soldier and capturing someone is about power and it would be quite easy to rape most women and more difficult to rape a man so a male capturerer(idk the word) would have more power over a man than a woman if he sexually abused them as most male soldiers think they are to big and hard to be gay(im not a homophobic its just what i heard) so are more likely to talk than be forced into gay sex
my oppinion is by the way that some women i know would do better in the army than men and by saying women arnt strong enough you are being sexest as were in the 21st centuary now and women can be just as strong as men..............would you have the same oppinion if a female body builder got intothe army and a small 16 year old boy who can just aboult hold a SA80 in the firing position or would you allow that?
Linear Mode
